Email this article INVESTIGATING EFL SYRIAN UNDERGRADUATES’ VOCABULARY SIZE
Abstract
Vocabulary knowledge is an important aspect of learning English as a second/foreign language (ESL/ EFL). Previous research has given much attention to ESL/EFL learners’ knowledge of vocabulary by measuring their vocabulary size. Yet, in the EFL Syrian context, there is a rarity of research on learners’ vocabulary size. Therefore, the present study attempted to investigate vocabulary knowledge of English among EFL Syrian learners by measuring their vocabulary size based on a vocabulary size test (VST) adopted from Nation (2006). The study was conducted among 100 Syrian university learners joining English in one private university in Syria. The data collected from the participating students in the form of numerical responses to the vocabulary test was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The results revealed that the Syrian university learners’ overall vocabulary size in English was moderate (M=5.30). Moreover, the scores of the learners across the fourteen 1000-word families/lists of the vocabulary test varied from high to moderate. Based on the results, the study suggested that the average EFL Syrian undergraduates need to expand their vocabulary knowledge through training and instruction on vocabulary-raising awareness.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allen, F. A. (1983). Techniques in teaching vocabulary. New York: Oxford University Press.
Beglar, D (2010) A Rasch-based validation of the Vocabulary Size Test. Language Testing 27(1), 101-18.
Catalan, R. M. J. (2003). Sex differences in L2 vocabulary learning strategies. International Journal of
Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 54-77.
Chamot, A. U., & O'Malley, J. M. (1994). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic
language learning approach. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Gallo-Crail, R., &Zerwekh, R. (2002). Language learning and the Internet: Student strategies in vocabulary
acquisition. New technologies and language learning: Cases in the less commonly taught
languages, 55-79.
Gelo, O., Braakmann, D., &Benetka, G. (2008). Quantitative and qualitative research: Beyond the
debate. Integrative psychological and behavioral science, 42(3), 266-290.
Hashemian, M., &Mostaghasi, H. (2013). The Relationship between L2 Learners’ Vocabulary Learning
Strategies and Lexicon Size. A Paper Presented at the First National Conference on Teaching
English, Literature, and Translation, Kharazmi – Safashahr International Institute for Research
and Education, Shiraz, Iran.
Hirsh, D. & Nation, P. (1992). What vocabulary size is needed to read unsimplified texts for pleasure?
Reading in a Foreign Language, 8(2), 689-696.
Ibrahim, E. H. E., Othman, K., Sarudin, I., & Muhamad, A. J. (2013). Measuring the Vocabulary Size of
Muslim Pre-University Students. World Applied Sciences Journal, 21(21), 44-49.
Kafipour, R., Yazdi, M., Soori, A., &Shokrpour, N. (2011). Vocabulary levels and vocabulary learning
strategies of Iranian undergraduate students. Studies in Literature and Language, 3(3), 64-71.
Kalajahi, S. A. R., &Pourshahian, B. (2012). Vocabulary learning strategies and vocabulary size of ELT
students at EMU in Northern Cyprus. English Language Teaching, 5(4), 138-149.
Karami, H. (2012). The development and validation of a bilingual version of the Vocabulary Size
Test. RELC Journal, 43(1), 53-67.
Laufer, B. (1997). The lexical plight in second language reading: Words you don’t know, words you think
you know, and words you can’t guess. In Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition (eds J.
Coady& T. Huckin), pp.2–34. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Laufer, B., Elder, C., Hill, K., & Congdon, P. (2004). Size and strength: do we need both to measure
vocabulary knowledge? Language testing, 21(2), 202-226.
Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family practice, 13(6), 522- 526.
McCarthy, M., O’Dell, F., & Shaw, E. (2001). Basic vocabulary in use. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Nation, P. (1999). Learning vocabulary in another language. English Language Institute Occasional
Publication 19. Victoria University Wellington, New Zealand.
Nation, I. S. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Ernst KlettSprachen.
Nation, I. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern
Language Review, 63(1), 59-82.
Nation, I.S., &Beglar, D. (2007). A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher, 31(7): 9-13.
Nation, P., & Coxhead, A. (2014). Vocabulary size research at Victoria University of Wellington, New
Zealand. Language Teaching, 47(03), 398-403.
Nguyen, L., T., C., & Nation, I.S. (2011). A bilingual vocabulary size test of English for Vietnamese
learners. RELC Journal 42(1),86-99.
Read, J. (2000).Assessing Vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saville-Troike, M. (1984). What really matters in second language learning for academic
achievement?TESOL quarterly, 199-219.
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Ernst KlettSprachen.
Teng, F. (2014). Research into practice: Strategies for teaching and learning vocabulary. Beyond Words,
(2), 41-57.
Waring, R. (2003). At what rate do learners learn and retain new vocabulary from reading a graded reader?
Reading in a Foreign language, 15(2), 130.
Webb, S. (2008). Receptive and productive vocabulary sizes of L2 learners. Studies in Second language
acquisition,30(01),79-95.
Yunus, K., Mohamad, M., & Waelateh, B. (2016). The breadth of receptive vocabulary knowledge among
English major university students. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 1(1), 7-17.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24200/mjll.vol6iss1pp1-9
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal and its content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.